Buffer fixes#87
Merged
Gadgetoid merged 3 commits intopimoroni:mainfrom Sep 12, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
(added the python linting fixes mentioned here) |
Member
|
LGTM! Thank you. |
Contributor
|
The destructor unfortunately prevents |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Very small fix to initialise allocated storage when creating a new buffer; otherwise you end up with junk in your buffer, and I've had variable success in clearing it up.
The larger fix is to track when
buffer()allocates memory when creating a newbuffer_tobject, and to delete it properly on destruction. Obviously only an issue if you create/discard a lot of buffers, but still...